Pages: 1 2
Author Topic: GML?  (176,653 Views)
Offline (Unknown gender) ludamad

Developer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,256
View profile
Posted on: May 08, 2008, 04:47:27 PM
ENIGMA really shouldn't call it's scripting language GML, as neither is a proper subset of either. E++ is more like it, or C.En, to show its relationship to C++. Those are just suggestions, thoughts? Oh and you can move this, but this is a comment about this forum name.
Offline (Unknown gender) Josh @ Dreamland

Prince of all Goldfish
Developer
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,950
View profile
Reply #1 Posted on: May 08, 2008, 07:43:06 PM
It isn't actually called GML, as that'd be copyright infringement.

It is unofficially EDL, but has no official name.
Offline (Unknown gender) Halibutski

Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7
View profile
Reply #2 Posted on: May 09, 2008, 12:01:22 AM
If calling it GML is copyright infringement, wouldn't making the language exactly the same also be?
Offline (Unknown gender) TheExDeus

Developer
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,860
View profile
Reply #3 Posted on: May 18, 2008, 05:35:57 PM
Language can't be copyrighted, but names can be. So it can't be called GML, but it can be exactly the same.
Offline (Unknown gender) RetroX

Master of all things Linux
Contributor
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,055
View profile
Reply #4 Posted on: May 23, 2008, 03:58:31 PM
Exactly.  For example, there are several versions of BASIC made by several people, so why not GML?
Offline (Unknown gender) Quadduc

LateralGM Developer
LGM Developer
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 15
View profile
Reply #5 Posted on: June 12, 2008, 02:12:49 PM
Names cannot be copyrighted. They might be trademarked, which is something completely different.

Trademark law exists to let customers know what they buy. I do not think "GML" or "Game Maker Language" is trademarked (or can be trademarked at all), and if it is, you could still use the name, because it is purely descriptive.

Of course, confusing the users would not be good in any case. If the language is exactly the same as GML, you can call it GML. If it's different but compatible, you might say it's compatible with GML. Otherwise you might say it's similar to GML.
Offline (Unknown gender) IsmAvatar

LateralGM Developer
LGM Developer
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 877
View profile
Reply #6 Posted on: August 20, 2008, 11:13:30 PM
Even if "Game Maker Language" is trademarked, you can still call it GML, because GML can be anything. It could be Gnomes Making Love, or Gnu Master License, or Gaseous Molten Lava, or Game Manipulation Logic
Offline (Unknown gender) serprex

Smooth ER
Developer
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 106
View profile WWW
Reply #7 Posted on: August 21, 2008, 12:09:43 AM
Ya, the issue is less about useless copyright issues and more about there being more suitable names
Offline (Unknown gender) Josh @ Dreamland

Prince of all Goldfish
Developer
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,950
View profile
Reply #8 Posted on: September 04, 2008, 11:44:25 PM
I still don't feel the jabbing need to piss off the, er, 'that other company' any further.
Offline (Unknown gender) qc.zackf

Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 41
View profile
Reply #9 Posted on: August 03, 2009, 03:07:02 PM
E++ sounds good...

What does E.D.L. stand for?  Enigmas' Delicious Language?
Offline (Unknown gender) RetroX

Master of all things Linux
Contributor
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,055
View profile
Reply #10 Posted on: August 03, 2009, 07:50:03 PM
Quote from: qc.zackf on August 03, 2009, 03:07:02 PM
E++ sounds good...

What does E.D.L. stand for?  Enigmas' Delicious Language?
Enigmas'?  It would be ENIGMA's, if anything.  And either way, it's "ENIGMA Development Language".
Offline (Unknown gender) Josh @ Dreamland

Prince of all Goldfish
Developer
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,950
View profile
Reply #11 Posted on: August 10, 2009, 02:34:44 AM
I like the name much better when no one knows what it stands for.

I often bash GML as being Game Markup Language. <game><mmo><error="fail">Your card doesn't support this awesomeness.</error></mmo></game>

But all the closing tags are optional, of course.
Offline (Unknown gender) RetroX

Master of all things Linux
Contributor
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,055
View profile
Reply #12 Posted on: August 10, 2009, 03:26:02 AM
Any graphics card can play a Game Maker game at a solid 2 FPS.  Any.  That is, unless the line of code checking your OS doesn't find out you're using 98.
Offline (Unknown gender) Josh @ Dreamland

Prince of all Goldfish
Developer
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,950
View profile
Reply #13 Posted on: August 10, 2009, 03:19:50 PM
nope, I have computers at my school that won't run GM at all.
...
That's only because they don't have Direct3D installed, though.
Offline (Unknown gender) qc.zackf

Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 41
View profile
Reply #14 Posted on: August 10, 2009, 06:55:17 PM
Quote from: Josh @ Dreamland on August 10, 2009, 03:19:50 PM
nope, I have computers at my school that won't run GM at all.
...
That's only because they don't have Direct3D installed, though.

Are they mac or linux based?
Pages: 1 2