Pages: 1
  Print  
Author Topic: Legal standing of this project  (Read 13365 times)
Offline (Unknown gender) x
Posted on: September 04, 2013, 03:09:29 am

Member
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 19

View Profile
Hi all,
I am curious as to the legal status of this project. I'm sure everything's fine, especially since YYG hasn't taken any legal action, but I still have a few questions:
  • Is GML the intellectual property of Overmars?
  • Could this project be sued for using a near identical IDE layout in LGM to GM's? (especially the button artwork, actions etc)
  • Is the GMK format copyrighted?

Cheers.
Logged
x
Offline (Unknown gender) popcade
Reply #1 Posted on: September 04, 2013, 09:00:10 am

Member
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 29

View Profile
Maybe replacing the button artworks with new icons is a good idea....
Logged
Offline (Male) Goombert
Reply #2 Posted on: September 04, 2013, 12:33:51 pm

Developer
Location: Cappuccino, CA
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2991

View Profile
1) No, languages can not be copyrighted and the Supreme Court has said so and will uphold this.
2) No, again Apple vs. Microsoft, you can't patent the look and feel of applications, the Supreme Court has said so
3) No, because it is just binary compression, it is un-copyrightable, hell if that were copyrightable, I don't know where the fuck the computer industry would be today, probably in the dark ages
Logged
I think it was Leonardo da Vinci who once said something along the lines of "If you build the robots, they will make games." or something to that effect.

Offline (Unknown gender) TheExDeus
Reply #3 Posted on: September 04, 2013, 01:00:27 pm

Developer
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1860

View Profile
Quote
3) No, because it is just binary compression, it is un-copyrightable, hell if that were copyrightable, I don't know where the fuck the computer industry would be today, probably in the dark ages
Computer file formats can be copyrightable (and oftentimes are), but I don't think GMK (or any GM format) is. I think they are just too lazy to do it legally and they change it too often. Usually for copyright they can just add "(c)" with some more info and it would be legally binding, but they can only add that for file format specification. As they haven't released the file format openly (and for LGM project it has always been reverse engineered), then they cannot do that.
Logged
Offline (Unknown gender) x
Reply #4 Posted on: September 05, 2013, 05:03:49 am

Member
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 19

View Profile
1) No, languages can not be copyrighted and the Supreme Court has said so and will uphold this.
2) No, again Apple vs. Microsoft, you can't patent the look and feel of applications, the Supreme Court has said so
3) No, because it is just binary compression, it is un-copyrightable, hell if that were copyrightable, I don't know where the fuck the computer industry would be today, probably in the dark ages
Good to hear!
Logged
x
Offline (Unknown gender) time-killer-games
Reply #5 Posted on: September 09, 2013, 03:17:15 pm
"Guest"


Email
Here is something I don't really understand:
http://www.64digits.com/users/index.php?userid=T%20G%20M%20G&cmd=comments&id=20488&hl=ames&page=2
Quote
Just as I added the gml parser, Mark decided to make G-java and all other projects that read gmk files illegal. So I had no choice but to give up. I made the project open source, so if their are any java programmers out their who would be interested in viewing the source they can.
This appears to be a red flag and if Mark/YYG can seriously make GMK parsers illegal, what would happen if ENIGMA finally started to be a serious, enormous threat to them and their business, would they get jealous and shutdown enigma like the already did to G-Java? This raises a little concern to me and the more I find out about YYG the more I increase in disliking them. The fact that they can do stuff like this whenever they feel like it is just stupid.

Just that easy it appears that all the countless hours of work put into this project over the years can be permanently halted with legal threats. Of coarse, I'm not 100% all I fear is true, but if it stopped G-Java's development how is enigma any different?
« Last Edit: September 09, 2013, 03:22:55 pm by time-killer-games » Logged
Offline (Male) Goombert
Reply #6 Posted on: September 09, 2013, 03:33:12 pm

Developer
Location: Cappuccino, CA
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2991

View Profile
@TKG we're not breaking any single copyright law, they don't even care about GMK, they have GMX now, and they don't care that Jobo made a GMX reader for Parakeet shit .NET IDE, so trust me, they don't care about the formats. As for everything were in perfectly good legal standing, we also implement functions and features to the language so everything is not exactly the same.

Edit: Oh and lets not forget, they use tons of free and open source stuff like Box2D for physics and what not, they just go around jacking up open source shit and duct taping it together and slapping $100's of dollars price tags on the shit.
« Last Edit: September 09, 2013, 04:10:39 pm by Robert B Colton » Logged
I think it was Leonardo da Vinci who once said something along the lines of "If you build the robots, they will make games." or something to that effect.

Offline (Unknown gender) TheExDeus
Reply #7 Posted on: September 09, 2013, 05:06:23 pm

Developer
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1860

View Profile
Quote
@TKG we're not breaking any single copyright law, they don't even care about GMK, they have GMX now, and they don't care that Jobo made a GMX reader for Parakeet shit .NET IDE, so trust me, they don't care about the formats. As for everything were in perfectly good legal standing, we also implement functions and features to the language so everything is not exactly the same.
Technically they do care as the formats are the only legal standing they could have on projects like ENIGMA (as they didn't patent the IDE design or anything). But they have stopped with all the legal stuff since gmk's way back many years ago. Then they really were hurting people making decompilers and obscurers and stuff. I remember that they even added some line to the EULA many years ago (I think it wasn't even YYG back then) which made it illegal to decompile a game. So while they have stopped with the enforcing, it doesn't mean they cannot do it.

Quote
Edit: Oh and lets not forget, they use tons of free and open source stuff like Box2D for physics and what not, they just go around jacking up open source shit and duct taping it together and slapping $100's of dollars price tags on the shit.
That is nothing to do with this topic.
Logged
Offline (Male) Goombert
Reply #8 Posted on: September 09, 2013, 05:08:33 pm

Developer
Location: Cappuccino, CA
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2991

View Profile
Ahhh w/e harri like there's anything ethical about what they are doing.
Logged
I think it was Leonardo da Vinci who once said something along the lines of "If you build the robots, they will make games." or something to that effect.

Offline (Unknown gender) TheExDeus
Reply #9 Posted on: September 09, 2013, 05:11:22 pm

Developer
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1860

View Profile
Nothing really unethical either.
Logged
Pages: 1
  Print