Thank God that stupid maximizing shit has gone.

Josh said he's already fixed those errors. Suggests pulling the newest JDI.

The installer is fine. Josh just needs to fix those errors.

Will be Josh's fault but surely once those ambiguities are resolved it will work for you?

Harri can you try the installer zip again, does it work for you now?

That thing has been failing since its conception. It's a short matter of time before everyone is sick of maintaining it.

Also, post 2468. I win.

Robert said yesterday that he's fixed it, it should be fine now. Also it doesn't need maintaining, well the dependencies should still be put on-line and downloaded so they can be maintained separately but overall it doesn't need to be changed any more.

Or people can just use the installer zip?

Oh I was actually going to suggest something like that, never mind.

Fenris78 did you have mingw already installed before you tried the Installer zip?

I think the problem some people still have is with that hack cheeseboy did to set the env path.

Who the fuck is going to use a million objects?

So basically you are finished now?

In the circle functions:

Code Select Expand

        if (intersects)
        {
            if (inside)
            {
                inst->deactivate();
                enigma::instance_deactivated_list.insert(inode_pair((*it)->id,it.it));
            }
        }
        else
        {
            if (!inside)
            {
                inst->deactivate();
                enigma::instance_deactivated_list.insert(inode_pair((*it)->id,it.it));
            }
        }

I've searched in the source code of ENIGMA the function and i found in coll_funcs.cpp the following code :

Code Select Expand

            if (inside) {
            inst->deactivate();
            enigma::instance_deactivated_list.insert(inode_pair((*it)->id,it.it));
            }
        } else {
            if (!inside) {
                inst->deactivate();
                enigma::instance_deactivated_list.insert(inode_pair((*it)->id,it.it));
            }


I am not an expert in C++ but it seems to me that the code is the same, whatever the value of inside. Am i right ?

That's not the full code, this is:

Code Select Expand

        if (left <= (rleft+rwidth) && rleft <= right && top <= (rtop+rheight) && rtop <= bottom) {
            if (inside) {
            inst->deactivate();
            enigma::instance_deactivated_list.insert(inode_pair((*it)->id,it.it));
            }
        } else {
            if (!inside) {
                inst->deactivate();
                enigma::instance_deactivated_list.insert(inode_pair((*it)->id,it.it));
            }
        }

ie it requires:

Code Select Expand

if (((left <= (rleft+rwidth) && rleft <= right && top <= (rtop+rheight) && rtop <= bottom) && inside)   ||
(!(left <= (rleft+rwidth) && rleft <= right && top <= (rtop+rheight) && rtop <= bottom) && !inside))

But yes that could be simplified to:

Code Select Expand

if ((left <= (rleft+rwidth) && rleft <= right && top <= (rtop+rheight) && rtop <= bottom) == inside)

EDIT: and I've just seen that Josh has already committed that, though he didn't think to look through the rest of the file for the same thing.

In this instance I think GM would have been better starting indexes at 1 and using 0 for noone.

So ForTheVin what percentage are you exactly through the enigma user move? And when is Josh going to change JDI to deal with it.