ENIGMA Development Environment

Forthevin can you tell me exactly how I am supposed to do this? I am good at helping with these very monotonous things like moving functions to a namespace, but Josh told me to hold off because it is very easy to mess up, and now I don't know how to start doing it. As far as I think I just need to move the function declaration and definition in the headers and sources into namespace enigma_user { } is that correct?

Does this resolve the issue with Box2D functions not being highlighted? That also needs worked out.

Ok as you all know I outlined or created the shell for my DX graphics port, now however the current MinGW version we use does not include the DX10/11 headers only the DX9 headers. This leaves us with two options...

1) Use a newer MinGW
2) Add Windows SDK as a dependency to the system

We would probably have to go through a bunch of bug fixes for MinGW but that's what I am most in favour of because there are no extra instalments required. The DirectX SDK is now a part of the Windows SDK since June of 2011, so you have to install everything with that and it takes about 3 hours. I would also rather not have to write it for Windows SDK and then have to redo all the make files for the MinGW headers.

**** MSG FOR FORTHEVIN ****

I have got everything working with the Windows SDK and am able to include the DX10 headers, but I am not able to decipher a darn thing about this Windowing system or to be able to creating the d3d device from within the graphics system without screwing up the windowing system, could you possibly help in ambiguating the window class to work with the DX graphics system? You seem to know more about that part than I do 

It is also possible for us to static link DX10, MinGW does come with the DX10 and DX11 shared libraries, then no Windows SDK installation would be required, it just requires someone who knows what they are doing with the makefiles to set the system up for me I can manage just fine writing the DX port after that, I just need the graphics device and windowing worked out.

I am not suggesting removing it, only making it less obtrusive to the navigation bar, thus why I do not have the option to remove it completely or leave it where it is, so to discuss alternative ways of it being integrated into the site design.

Home | Register | Login

the options are on there twice... we could easily move them up to that spot, and have the feed not trashin up the navbar, not one other open source site does that, it could just as easily go in the footer, regular users dont care about that crap

Great to have you back forthevin!!! 

In the debate of whether or not to use two licensed emoticon packs for the board, me and Josh decided to vectorize them together into a single pack, I have released them under GPL, you can find them on the Wiki.

http://enigma-dev.org/docs/Wiki/Calico_icons

These icons are provided free of charge, be sure to read the license agreement for them. This page is also compromised of the icon set for drag and drop actions and for the IDE buttons.