ENIGMA Development Environment

I'm not asking about whether quick edit should be kept, I'm asking about whether you'd be OK with going through a menu to get to it ala IPB

I wonder if Iceweasel works on Windows... It isn't Mozilla so it might work

Uh... you do know that Iceweasel is just Firefox without the copyrighted branding?

300 is SMF default >_>

Changed settings:

Maximum allowed characters 500
Maximum amount of lines 3
Maximum width of signature images (pixels) 550

From the glog:

Sandy, you need to work on your professionalism.

The poll that you set up on the GMC was obviously rigged/biased. Don’t even give us your bull about “giving us all the facts”, because

it’s a complete crock.

You wanted to shift the blame from you to the users, who (justifiably) criticize your idiotic actions. You wanted the easy way out,

using SoftWrap due to your laziness and incompetence.
Knowing that the release date was coming close, you also knew that there were impatient kids on the GMC, who would say/do anything for

it to be released sooner; not knowing the consequences until they actually have to use it.

So now for the fun part. You set up a poll about the inclusion of SoftWrap, but instead of just making it a poll about SoftWrap, you

make it also about the release date. Pretty classic example of putting sugar on a pile of crap.

Now, knowing that you got the vote of all the hyperactive kids (instead of a professional, but we must take into consideration that

you are the farthest thing from a professional, and lack any values even coming close to resembling professionalism), you can now say

that the ease of slapping SoftWrap in Game Maker is our fault. Congratulations!

I also like how you think such a small increase in license uses will make any difference whatsoever. Three (GM7) to five (GM8),

compared to as many as you want (GM6)? Do the math. I’d also like to note that you’re a really “in-the-box” thinker, as you think that

in order to have infinite uses (without contacting YoYoGames or SoftWrap) that Mark would have to handle all the orders himself. It’s

like you have no grasp on innovation or technology at all.

Sincerely,

Wilcox

P.S. This is far from a conspiracy theory. The system Sandy set up here is no more than grade 3 manipulation. It’s just that it’s so childish that you’d never expect the owner of a company to actually use it.

Oh my god it's Smarty!

Your conclusion based on the results are incredible – you get 3 to 5 thousand GM downloads daily, for who knows the entire 2 1/2 year, and yet you let 800 forum visitors decide by a fraction of difference?

You’ve used this canard of a poll to justify a decision that you clearly had already made. The statement you make above would have been much more of an incentive for Game Maker users to support your decision, in spite of perceived difficulties with Softwrap.

I don't understand legalese that well, but I'll make an attempt anyway.

I can think of a flaw already though - could someone make a closed source derivative from ENIGMA's code and claim it is fine due to it being compiled from ENIGMA itself?

As an exception, projects which you compile from The Program are not required to be considered as covered works and therefore are not required to be under This License.

The code boxes look more neat. I can't see any other difference

I decided to make it more consistent with the quote boxes when I was cleaning up the CSS

Welcome to SMF 2.0.

Welcome to this ugly default theme, as well.

The upgrader actually did a pretty good job at changing the ENIGMA theme to work for SMF 2.0, but it's obviously got its flaws and so I'm going to have to clean them up before we return to it. Well, they're mostly CSS-side, so it's all good.

Cleaned up the theme... mostly.

Along with the upgrade comes the new Optimizer group, which currently only contains serprex as a member currently.

& if you think svn is a joke: http://github.com/serprex/Enigma

http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-svn.html