I agree, and had I know that that was what you were arguing, I would have agreed earlier.
That discussion is stupid. The only argument was between "use the right tool for the job" and "use C++ for everything."
In other words, C++ is a low-level language, where everything is possible but nothing is simple. C/C++ are BRILLIANT languages for low-level programming.Java is a high-level language, where low-level things are more complex(and therefore hardly worth the effort to replace C), but things that were insane in C are very easy to handle in Java.Rusky didn't mention it on page 1, but he *did* on Anaphase already:QuoteC/++ and Java/C# both have their advantages.We did make our opinions pretty clear since the beginning. Did you even pay attention to what we wrote?
C/++ and Java/C# both have their advantages.