The awkwardness comes from the use of the word "things". Usually, "things" refers to a everything that you would usually use. Here, though, "things" actually refers to "the things that we keep running into". Basically, it's a difference between things = "everything" and things = "some things".
The point he was trying to make was that, for the purposes that we keep running into, GIT has a clear advantage. Whereas SVN "just works" and git is more complex (or steeper learning curve), once you get the hang of Git (which we have quickly done, since it was suddenly dumped on us, along with the help of those 1 or 2 wonderful git tutorials shared in the other topic), it's the clear winner, providing elegant solutions to things that we hacked around in SVN in the past - such as subprojects and forks.
And all this, considering that I was a diehard SVN fan, with a little loathing for the complexity (and documentation overflow) of git. Now I've converted pretty much all of my projects to Git. Read the tutorials from the other topic, and it's really not that much of a hastle after all.
EGit, on the other hand... that thing was a bugger to figure out.
Our current issue isn't so much that we can't Git (I just put that in the title to be funny), it's that we don't really understand the intent that Rusky was going with in deleting some of the stuff from the repository, and then he suddenly left, so now we kinda have to pick up his pieces. We've done fairly well, as you can see from this topic. Current issue is just the alure sound system, which he deleted, even though it was clearly modified from alure, so we don't have a clue what he did that for.